When components in non-ESD packaging are assembled with ESDS in an EPA used in the

  Users of electrononic components do not want static-generating materials in their EPAs, but  suppliers of non-ESDS often use non-ESD packaging. Is there any packaging guidance for non-ESDS?

Users of ESD susceptible components will not want to bring ordinary packaging materials into an EPA workstation where ESDS are handled. There are no requirements in the standards for suppliers of non-ESDS components to supply their product in non static generating packaging. So, many will use ordinary plastics in their packaging which could compromise ESD safety and compliance if brought onto an EPA workstation. It is for the user to decide how to handle this, e.g. by removing non-compliant packaging before bringing the component into the EPA workstation.

This is one reason why the modern standards say that non-essential insulators must not be present on a workstation where ESDS are handled, rather than in the EPA in general. Some people write their ESD control program to allow items in non-ESD packaging to a bench conveniently placed near the one where they handle ESDS, but not near enough to cause ESD risk from the plastic packaging. The packaging can then be removed from the component on a workstation where ESDS are NOT handled and the component transferred to the workstation where they are assembled with ESDS. This approach relies on a high level of understanding by operators to prevent stray packaging arriving on the workstation where ESDS are handled and other ESD risks.

Others write their ESD program to prohibit non-essential insulators from the EPA, and repackage the non-ESDS into ESD packaging before they are brought into the EPA.